HomeMagazineListingsUpdateLinksContexts

 


 Ballet.co Postings Pages

 Some Special Threads:
  GPDTalk about George Piper Dances ! NEW !
  NBTTalk about Northern Ballet Theatre
  SBTalk about Scottish Ballet
  ENBTalk about English National Ballet
  BRBTalk about Birmingham Royal Ballet
  TodaysLinks - worldwide daily dance links
  Ballet.co GetTogethers - meetings and drinks...

  Help on New Postings


Subject: "Random Dance Company in Discussion" Archived thread - Read only
 
  Previous Topic | Next Topic
Printer-friendly copy     Email this topic to a friend    
Conferences What's Happening Topic #539
Reading Topic #539
Julia Murray

23-02-00, 04:04 PM (GMT)
Click to EMail Julia%20Murray Click to send private message to Julia%20Murray Click to add this user to your buddy list  
"Random Dance Company in Discussion"
 
   RANDOM DANCE COMPANY

Wayne McGregor and Collaborative Artists Discuss the Trilogy

Notes taken by Julia Murray, Lecturer in Dance, Darlington College at the above event.
Stockton Arc, 22/2/00


Wayne:
 Given a 12 month research grant to explore relationships between new technology and art (primarily visual and music). E.g.'s. 'Playing' virtual instruments/orchestras, 3D virtual performers linked to live performers elsewhere.
 Trilogy developed as a durational journey over four years working with same group of collaborative artists. (Dancers increased from 7 to 8 and also males have changed). Decided to address the four elements.
 The Millennarium (1997) - Water. Millennium/Aquarium. A futuristic aquarium.
A lottery bid for 110,000.00 for technological equipment was awarded after the piece was conceived. Technology is therefore primarily a graphic and visual language. The set comprised a 3D sculptural set onto which images could be projected and dancers in the space.
 Sulphur 16 (1999) - Fire.
More integrated with technology in terms of its effects on choreography (computer generated, generic etc). Virtual and live cast integrated. Guazes, light etc used to shift perception. Sound ecology was clean, clear, through the body. Elemental sound of "nothing" at one stage, dead space, hearing the sounds of your own body. 16 sections each 4.22 seconds with different behaviours, playing with time concepts.
 Aeon (2000) - Earth and Air.
Complete integration of technology. Polarity of structures. In three parts:
1. 9 mins. 3D animation. 3 solos filmed digitally then animated.
2. 30 mins. Animated body mutates into space. Labyrinth, kinetic spaces, live dance. The spaces are choreographed. 7 solos - 7 events - 7 ages of man. Combinations of possibilities.
Transition: 2 mins of quick kinetic material to a black space.
3. 25 mins. Historical, traditional setting. New technology of the body. Physical language developed, new. Just live performers.
 All process is a dialogue, collaboration. Concepts of all types are developed by those with the skills. Choreography is made collaboratively with the dancers.

Dancers:
 Given a task, put into your own body, pushed further by Wayne, therefore challenging.
 Mental agility, intellectual dancers, mathematical structures.
 Physicality pushed especially in the speed and action
 Strong technical background necessary

Wayne:
 Important to negotiate and empower dancers

Lucy (lighting designer):
 Original concept form Wayne, dialogue goes back and forth.
 Inspiration from a variety of sources
 Being pushed to do things which seem impossible
 Create a package of ideas which communicate the ideas
 Aeon becomes more present physically so the lighting makes the dancers more apparent.
 Problems with light washing out virtual/projected images.
 Set/Floor connects earth and air and is also restricting in terms of where lanterns can be placed

Wayne:
 Tends to work in very structured manner, methodologies etc. Likes new input to take /see things in a new direction/way. Music is inputted at late stage. Collaboration with Zoviet France began 22/02/00 and first performance is 25/02/00.

Mark, Zoviet France:
 The band is experimental, improvisational. Equipment is set up and they go for it.
 Sound is random, chance, risk, sampling, jumping, erratic rhythms. Sounds are altered to swell, stretch to fill the space or shrunk back down. A movement of sound. "Sound design", architecturally and choreographically. Making intuitive choices.
 Instruments traditional/non-traditional, children's toys, CD's etc etc.
 Comparatively recent collaborations with contemporary dance
 Eventually as finances don't stretch to live performances for all venues piece is put onto DAT

Wayne:
 Difference between live and recorded music performances is critical

Questions:
Inspirations? Cunningham, Forsythe, Teshigawara (?!! Japanese choreographer - no idea how to spell it). Film - Art House. Visual Art.

Company Classes? Mixture of techniques

Recording of Work? Documented for Company use. Doesn't translate onto video/film. More concerned with live performance. However, first section of Aeon will be toured as visual art event to galleries.


  Printer-friendly page | Top

Conferences | Topics | Previous Topic | Next Topic

 
Questions or problems regarding this bulletin board should be directed to Bruce Marriott