>Bruce I’m wondering about what you said
>about joint directorships - specifically Bull
>and Sansom. Are you suggesting that
>or have they? Also, could you
>clarify this Mukamedov and Bintley thing
>- do they or don’t they
>want to do the job together
>(I’d be surprised if they did
>but just so we get it
Bull and Sansom is a suggestion of mine - it's not soemthing I necessarily see as the winning combination though. I think that they are both a little young to be credible as ADs on their own this time - perhaps next time. However they might might do better together. Bruce would sort out the herritage/traditional stuff and Deborah the new be more front of house.
On the Mukhamedov and Bintley 'partnership' ideally you need to follow the link and read the interview with them both. It looks to be Irek's idea but Bintley seems not to be particularly interested.
>Anyway, my point was to suggest another
>possibility; what about Monica Mason doing
>the job for five years or
>so with one of the youngsters
>- Bull or Sansom - taking
>her position while they learn the
>ropes? She’s such an important figure
>in the company I’m not sure
>how she could work with a
>new and especially younger or less
>experienced candidate as the “big boss.”
> Plus, I think that despite
>they’re youth and lack of direct
>oral experience I think that Bull
>and Sansom could have a lot
>to offer the company. I would
>like to argue the pros and
>cons (although I’m more on the
>pro side I must admit )
>of this but unfortunately don’t have
>the time right now - just
>thought I’d see what response it
The thing against Mason, Bull and Sansom - I think - would be them being too close to RB already. Would they really drive it forward in rich new ways? Would they question sacred cows or would it be more business as usual?
I think the key person in all this is Kaiser. His background is as a business consultant and as such he will be looking for inovation, questioning and an AD that can make the company the best in the world. The past is important, needs to be respected, but the future is what counts. I think Kaiser, and the Board, will scour the world for talent. And like Kaiser himself there will be those with different views and perceptions about what is important and they could look incedibly good at interview.
The thing I took away from Kaiser's talk at the BA (Ballet Association) was that he sees the RB as a world class company looking for dancers, choreographers and management in a world pool. If they crop up locally than that is great, but if there is better eleswhere, then you go get it. You become the best in the world by recruiting the best in the world. ABT, from where Kaiser has sprung, was sick when he took it on and is now widely regarded as having the best line-up of dancers in the world.
At the moment we are all looking at the list of people who have worked with RB. Thats perhaps too narrow.
Pleased that you want to debate - I think there is an awful lot to debate here. But its too late (and I had too good a time at the BA dinner tonight!). And do excuse the typos...