 |
Sim
|
10-12-02, 11:36 PM (GMT) |
 |
"Wind in the Willows"
| |
I've just come back from the opening night, and it was an absolutely charming production....I loved it! It was original, well-acted by all concerned, a mixture of dancing, singing and just generally lots of fun. I would say the weak link was Anthony Dowell as the Narrator. It might just have been the sound system, but I often couldn't hear him properly. The poetry written by Andrew Motion was lovely, but lost in the mumbling of Dowell. Perhaps they should have got an actor to read the lines. He did give a reassuring and, dare I say it, almost grandfatherly presence to the proceedings, but I wish I could have heard the words more clearly. I was in a very good seat...I don't know what the people upstairs would have heard. The poetry is definitely not aimed at children; most of it would go over their heads, and I did notice some children talk and fidget when the 'reading bits' were on. However, this didn't detract at all from my enjoyment of the evening. I was with two 11 year-olds who also loved it, but for those of you who were slightly worried about going 'childless', there were surprisingly few children there! This is a production for children of all ages, and I hope it becomes a regular fixture at Christmas...I would happily see it every year. |
|
|
|
Printer-friendly page | Top |
|
|
Pete
|
11-12-02, 01:47 AM (GMT) |
 |
1. "RE: Wind in the Willows"
In response to message #0
| |
LAST EDITED ON 11-12-02 AT 02:30 AM (GMT) Sim The exact same observation about Anthony Dowell was brought up at the preview last Saturday, in fact the lady who originally brought up the matter suggested that "the narrator's delivery lacked confidence." Will Tuckett said that he would address the matter, which immediately brought to mind the amount of money I would pay to be the fly on the wall at the moment when Mr Tuckett told Sir Anthony Dowell to deliver his performance with more confidence! Anyway, sitting in the third row and being able to hear Sir Anthony's wonderful narration perfectly, I think that cranking the volume from 10 up to 11 would do the trick. Perhaps 12.... As for the production itself, I would sum it up as a real jack-in-the-box of a piece with an enchanting surprise around every corner. I have never experienced a piece that has so many unpredictable elements and yet stays so non-cliched and original - the concepts presented remain refreshing and original throughout. To give a more detailed synopsis of Wind in the Willows would bruise the enjoyment of anyone thinking of attending. Tuckett has thought about this piece deeply and has for the first time since the reopening of the Royal Opera House and the birth of the Linbury, used the whole of theatre to such an extent that those in the audience melt into the production like kids swallowed into a bedtime story. But for all it's potential to come across as a twee and cuddly tale of furry friends, Wind in the Willows is FUN!! It's an hilariously warming and an enchanting piece (with no ridiculous headgear -apart from the odd green wig), and I am sure it will enchant those young and young at heart for many years to come -it is suitable for kids of all ages. Sadly this piece would not transfer to the main auditorium successfully, though it does have fantastic potential for touring. I tried this evening to book to see the production again and it appears that there is standing room only for the current run. One can only hope for an extension of this fabulous piece. Those without a sense of fun need not attend.... |
|
|
|
Printer-friendly page | Top |
|
|
Sim
|
11-12-02, 09:14 AM (GMT) |
 |
2. "RE: Wind in the Willows"
In response to message #1
| |
I agree that to give a detailed synopsis would spoil it for those who are going, which is why mine was pretty general! I'm also glad I'm not the only one who had problems with Dowell. Just a quick word about the music as well: it was based on music by George Butterworth and really evoked a time and place that have gone, never to return. The musicians played it beautifully and I liked the way they were dispersed around the theatre. Of course this was for reasons of space, but it worked really well. I too would have loved to have seen it again, so as you say, I hope they extend the run. For those of you going, you have a real treat in store! |
|
|
|
Printer-friendly page | Top |
|
|
Sim
|
11-12-02, 09:37 AM (GMT) |
 |
3. "RE: Wind in the Willows"
In response to message #1
| |
Thanks Pete....I'm glad I'm not the only one who had trouble with Dowell's Narrator! Just a quick word about the music: it was George Butterworth, and beautifully evoked a time and place gone forever. Played joyously by the muscians, who were dispersed around the auditorium. This was for reasons of space, but it worked very well. Agree also that it couldn't transfer to a much bigger venue, so here's hoping that the run is extended or that it becomes a regular fixture in the Christmas calendar. If I could go again during this run, I certainly would! |
|
|
|
Printer-friendly page | Top |
|
|
Paul A
|
11-12-02, 12:42 PM (GMT) |
|
6. "RE: Wind in the Willows"
In response to message #4
| |
>(Strangely, I think I remember >that Dowell danced the very >funny role of the bridegroom >too. Could I be >getting confused here? Did >anyone else see this production?). > No that's when they were on strike in 1988!
But were there two revivals? Think Dowell narrated in 1988 - wasn't Jacobi an earlier revival (he hazards hazily)? |
|
|
|
Printer-friendly page | Top |
|
|
sallyfvt
|
11-12-02, 03:30 PM (GMT) |
|
7. "RE: Wind in the Willows"
In response to message #6
| |
Am suffering severe frustration about Wind in the Willows, because of being thousands of miles away! I wanted to see it as soon as I heard of it. One ballet.co-er mentioned that there were good photos in promotional literature he received from ROH, and I tried emailing ROH to ask if those photos could be posted on their web site or if I could be put on their mailing list, but have received no reply. Is there a program with photos that anyone would be willing to send me in the US? (I'd reimburse them somehow, of course.) |
|
|
|
Printer-friendly page | Top |
|
|
MarkE
|
11-12-02, 05:55 PM (GMT) |
|
9. "RE: Wind in the Willows"
In response to message #8
| |
In places brilliant, in others very weak. As mentioned, the narrator needs to be some one with gravitas, presence and a strong delivery. He has some great speeches and I just felt that an actor with a little more experience would be able to handle the prose more effectively. Not so much a dance production, more theatre with movement. In fact that short 'dance sequences' are a little distracting and feel a bit like fillers. However, you can really see that the rehearsal period has been a long one and each actor has really been able to establish a strong physical characterisation. Philippa Gordon as Mole demonstrates a myopic naivete that is utterly beguiling. Will Kemp proves once again what a chameleon he is coming on all Errol Flynn as Ratty. Matthew Hart is all tongues and flippety legs as the exasperating Toad and Adam Cooper is all bluster, bah humbug as Badger. The supporting cast are all brilliant whether they are ducks, otters or butterflies. The set is by the Brothers Quay and echoes the feeling of the Brothers Grimm fairy tales which are magical and also slightly sinister. Cupboards become caravans, chairs become prisons in exactly the way that they do in the imaginations of children playing make believe. There was much debate on this site about the use of masks, much of it being 'No thankyou'. There are none, the animal's identity is mainly suggested by their movement, this works to a degree, but as this is a production aimed at 5 year olds up I felt a few more visual clues would be of assistance to some of the younger audience members. Could Badger have some more Badger-esque markings on his costume (a white stripe?), if the Bunnies have ears, why dont Mole and Ratty, or perhaps a tail for Ratty? I also thought that Ratty should be in plus fours, or at least longer length shorts, but then that me is nit picking! The Weasels/Stoats are such a cliche-punk happened over 20 years ago!The weasel puppets come out too soon I feel they should only be seen for the first time when they poke their heads out of the cupboard, again the director in me nit picking. However, I had a lovely evening as did everyone else I spoke too and if you have managed to get a ticket you are in for a treat, I guarantee the kids will be talking about the snow on the way home! |
|
|
|
Printer-friendly page | Top |
|
|
Sim
|
11-12-02, 06:50 PM (GMT) |
 |
12. "RE: Wind in the Willows"
In response to message #8
| |
Sally and Ann....the programme, I'm afraid, is just a paper folding brochure, not a 'real' programme. When I first walked in and saw the programmes were £1.00, I thought 'ah, that's more like it', but it wasn't until the usher handed it to me that I realized it was just a paper fold-up! Anyway, it tells you all you need to know, including biographies and a history of the WitW book. Whether there is anything else in the ROH shop I don't know. I was in there last week when I was at Swan Lake and I didn't notice anything, but maybe now that it's opened there might be something there. |
|
|
|
Printer-friendly page | Top |
|
|
Sim
|
13-12-02, 07:18 PM (GMT) |
 |
17. "RE: Wind in the Willows"
In response to message #16
| |
Hi! I'm Julia,Sim's daughter. I'm 11 years old and I love ballet!! I'm on grade 4 doing RAD. I thought it would be interesting to hear a child's point of view of this ballet. I go to the ballet a lot with mum so I sort of know what's good and what isn't!! I thought the Wind in the Willows was the most enchanting ballet!! The dancers were great, the costumes good and the scenery interesting! I thought at first that Adam Cooper was really scary but then I realised he was meant to be kind of eerie!! I loved Ratty!! He was played so well by Will Kemp.All four were brilliant but Toad was so funny I nearly screamed in the theatre!! I had a friend of mine there who also loves dance. Although she does modern dance at the Place she still loved it.While we walked back to the car we danced out the whole ballet again not giving the slightest care in the world who was watching!! If you haven't yet seen this most fantastic and superb production of Wind in the Willows I suggest you get ya boots on hurry up and see it!!! Thank you Juliax |
|
|
|
Printer-friendly page | Top |
|
|
Ann Welsh
|
17-12-02, 03:20 PM (GMT) |
 |
20. "RE: Wind in the Willows"
In response to message #19
| |
I went on Sunday night and found the shop open. So if anybody wants them, I have postcards of Adam, Will, Matthew and Pippa, plus a programme. Anybody interested, e-mail me. No charge, it will be a pleasure to pass on anything to anyone who couldn't get to see the show. And what a lovely night it was. Totally enchanting! Sir Ant had obviously had his mike hiked up a bit and came over loud and clear and enjoying himself tremendously, as were the dancers. Man of the match was, of course, Matthew Hart, but Will, Adam and especially Pippa Gordon were absolutely spot-on. But Luke Heydon just has to have a special mention, popping up in all sorts of guises, especially the butch Washerwoman. There were so many enchanting moments - the carol singers, the snow storm......I won't go on. Anyway, just a 'feel-good' event. Surely this must enter into the Christmas repertoire, not just in London. But what a lovely venue the Linbury is. I hadn't been before. Great sightlines, cosy feeling...lovely. Incidentally, I believe one reviewer said that the part of Toad was to have been played by Sarah Wildor before she became involved in 'Contact'. I simply can't conceive of this role being played by anybody but Matthew. His high-energy levels and sense of comedy, not to say his immaculate dancing, have simply defined the role. But I did get to see Sarah in 'Contact' and she is lovely and sparkly and a great speaking actress. But what a waste. Why isn't she back with the RB?
|
|
|
|
Printer-friendly page | Top |
|
|
Mike
|
22-12-02, 11:19 AM (GMT) |
 |
24. "RE: Wind in the Willows"
In response to message #23
| |
I was lucky enough to pick up a couple of returns for last night's performance after we came out from yesterday's Nutcracker matinee. I had tried without sucess to get hold of tickets several times over the last couple of weeks. The lady at the box office said that the company sometimes return unused tickets from their allocation for re-sale during the afternoon prior to the performances, so it may be worthwhile for anyone without tickets to try the box office around 3.00-ish. All I can say to those going today is, you won't be disappointed. A thoroughly charming production, with lots of lovely touches, already mentioned on earlier posts to this thread. We especially liked the snow, the carol singers (a nice seasonal touch) and the 'chase' through the foyer area during the interval. In addition to the performances already praised, special mention should also go to Iohna Loots for her delightful portrayal of the 'Post Rabbit' I hope that it's revived next year, with a few more performances next time. See it if you can! |
|
|
|
Printer-friendly page | Top |
|
|
|