Ballet.co Postings Pages

 Some Special Threads:
  GPDTalk about George Piper Dances ! NEW !
  NBTTalk about Northern Ballet Theatre
  SBTalk about Scottish Ballet
  ENBTalk about English National Ballet
  BRBTalk about Birmingham Royal Ballet
  TodaysLinks - worldwide daily dance links
  Ballet.co GetTogethers - meetings and drinks...

  Help on New Postings

Subject: "SFB Programme 1 review 13/8/01" Archived thread - Read only
  Previous Topic | Next Topic
Printer-friendly copy     Email this topic to a friend    
Conferences What's Happening Topic #2005
Reading Topic #2005
Lynette H

15-08-01, 02:56 PM (GMT)
Click to EMail Lynette%20H Click to send private message to Lynette%20H Click to view user profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
"SFB Programme 1 review 13/8/01"
   Programme 1, San Francisco Ballet, Royal Opera House, 13 August 2001

San Francisco Ballet are bringing twelve different ballets to Covent Garden in the space of a single week. This represents an astonishing variety. You would have to attend Covent Garden diligently for months to get to see twelve different works. It’s a really bold programme, full of all those things which we are told don’t sell well – all mixed bills, including new works. And all this presented in the middle of August when most of London has departed for a beach somewhere, after the rival glories of a Kirov season and other guests.

It would be nice to say that this was a triumph to a sold out house, but this would be quite accurate. All the cheaper seats seemed to be occupied, with the Amphi full, and lots of people in the upper slips, and a number of people standing. The stalls looked fairly full, but almost all the boxes in the grand tier and balcony were empty. I think this probably reflects the shift in ticket prices: these were noticeably cheaper on SFB’s previous visits to Sadlers and to the Edinburgh Festival.

The evening was a touch uneven on the dance front, but it concluded with a terrific performance of Balanchine’s Symphony in Three Movements which really showed off the company’s strengths.

The evening began with Jerome Robbins’ Fanfare. It was a neat choice for London: it is set to Britten’s Young Person’s Guide to the Orchestra, and the narrative was spoken by the splendidly robed and fruitily voiced Major Domo of George James in decidedly proper BBC English. It was a charming introduction to the company as each group of dancers, matched with different instruments, took their turn upon the stage. The costumes, each embellished with the musical instrument the dancer was illustrating, were delightfully witty – the brass section featured the daftest hats to be seen this side of an Eton boating party. It was a lighthearted opening, with some rather jazzy notes and wiggling of the hips undercutting the formal precision from time to time. It’s a group work rather than an exercise for individual virtuosity, but Muriel Maffre still deserves a mention as the harp.

Mark Morris’s A Garden wasn’t the huge hit that I think fans of Sandpaper Ballet, presented on SFB’s last visit to great acclaim, might have expected. The audience response was a little muted. Morris’s musical instincts are remarkably sure: Richard Strauss’ orchestration of pieces by Couperin was delightful. It was interesting to hear the 18th century through the filter of the 20th. The dance two seemed to evoke two quite different times: there was a feeling of formality, courtliness, and of Arcadian nymphs and shepherds. But frustratingly, this never seemed to fully develop: overlaid on this was a great sense of impatience, of very modern busy-ness, restlessness. Morris seemed far too inventive for his own good, trying out grouping after grouping, filling the stage with some new configuration every two minutes. It might have been preferable to see less ideas more fully developed. The costumes too seemed very dull, with the men in shirts that made them look like assistants in a DIY store.

The audience took to Magrittomania in a big way – and to the leads, Roman Rykine and Yuan Yuan Tan. This is a new work by company member Yuri Possokhov. Magritte’s paintings were the inspiration – cue for lots of bowler hats and would-be surrealist dresses for the women, beautifully cut but with big fake plastic boobs attached. I enjoyed the dancing of the group of three men (Gonzalo Garcia, Stephen Legate, Guennadi Nedviguine) in this – they seemed to have the best of the choreography. It wasn’t really clear exactly what was causing all the anguish with Rykine seemed to be suffering.

Symphony in Three Movements was a real treat. The company looked in great form, confident, poised, full of energy. There’s a tremendous amount packed in to a little over twenty minutes, and it’s difficult to do justice to it here. Lucia Lacarra, partnered by Yuri Possokhov, proved to be the audience favorite, but, again, it was very much a ‘company’ presentation, rather than being about stars. More please !

  Printer-friendly page | Top

  Subject     Author     Message Date     ID  
  RE: SFB Programme 1 review 13/8/01 Renee Renouf 16-08-01 1

Conferences | Topics | Previous Topic | Next Topic
Renee Renouf

16-08-01, 03:47 AM (GMT)
Click to EMail Renee%20Renouf Click to send private message to Renee%20Renouf Click to add this user to your buddy list  
1. "RE: SFB Programme 1 review 13/8/01"
In response to message #0
   Lynette, thank you!

I was so delighted to hear the audience reaction to "Magrittomania". The Isadora Duncan Dance Award Committee voted it one of two bests for choreography for the 1999-2000 season.
Rykine and Tan are so good in their roles, and you may have
read my comments about the other casts.

The fuss, I think, is about coming to maturity in a society,
any society, which has not only norms, but the norms are heavily reinforced by all the rational demands of technology. It may
make for greater ideosyncracies and superficial differences, but
not necessarily for character and resolution of life's challenges. In the U.S. the equivalent is "The Man in The Grey Flannel Suit", i.e. everything correct, all selections de rigeur, but in the last analysis, whatever for? I think that's one of the reason the male pas de trois to klezmer music is such a hit, besides being wonderful to see danced. Does that help?

Thank you and everyone else for such responsiveness to the repertoire. I am particularly happy that Helgi Tomasson has such an affinity to Jerome Robbins - worth every moment of it.

  Printer-friendly page | Top

Conferences | Topics | Previous Topic | Next Topic

Questions or problems regarding this bulletin board should be directed to Bruce Marriott