Ballet.co Postings Pages

 Some Special Threads:
  GPDTalk about George Piper Dances ! NEW !
  NBTTalk about Northern Ballet Theatre
  SBTalk about Scottish Ballet
  ENBTalk about English National Ballet
  BRBTalk about Birmingham Royal Ballet
  TodaysLinks - worldwide daily dance links
  Ballet.co GetTogethers - meetings and drinks...

  Help on New Postings

Subject: "Martha Graham Center v Ron Protas" Archived thread - Read only
  Previous Topic | Next Topic
Printer-friendly copy     Email this topic to a friend    
Conferences What's Happening Topic #1974
Reading Topic #1974
Brendan McCarthymoderator

09-08-01, 04:31 PM (GMT)
Click to EMail Brendan%20McCarthy Click to send private message to Brendan%20McCarthy Click to add this user to your buddy list  
"Martha Graham Center v Ron Protas"
   Some very good news. The Martha Graham Center of Contemporary Dance has won a legal victory over Graham's heir, Ron Protas, for the right to use her name and teach her technique. Protas had sued the Center and its associated school after he was fired as artistic director. He then revoked the licensing agreement that allowed the Center and school to use her name and perform her dances. If the Center had lost, it would have been the likely death knell for the technique itself.

The judge hearing the case found that Protas was "not a credible witness," and that he had misleadingly registered the names of the school and center in his own name at the federal Patent and Trademark Office.

The Graham Center’s lawyer said the ruling was a “complete and sweeping victory”. But Judge Miriam Cedarbaum has still to rule on the far more crucial issue of whether Protas can control the rights to Graham's ballets. The right to copyright dances dates from 1978, and most of Graham’s work has not been copyrighted. A victory for the Graham Center on this second issue could mean, according to some critics, that choreographers would have difficulty in establishing their rights to their own work. On the other hand, should Judge Cedarbaum find in Protas’ favour, Graham’s works could fade completely into oblivion, as the entire dance world has shunned Protas. Judgement is expected in late autumn.

Graham chose Protas to inherit, in the words of her will, "any rights that I might have" to the works she created. These rights may not enjoy copyright protection. Some may have fallen into the public domain or may belong to the Graham Center under the "works for hire" doctrine, which would mean that dances created by Graham while she was formally employed by the center belong to the center.

Protas was a controversial figure who as a young photographer insinuated himself into Graham’s life, and who made it his business to become indispensable to her. He saved Graham from her drinking, while systematically alienating her friends.

When Graham came to the ROH in 1976, Protas insisted that she not visit London Contemporary Dance Theatre, which had modelled itself on Graham and her methods. He dismissed LCDT as parasites deserving of neither acclaim nor notice. In his biography, A Life in the Arts, John Drummond, wrote:

“This seemed to me wicked, and I begged Graham to go to the LCDT’s studios at The Place. At once she became a troubled old lady and said sadly, “I don’t know who to believe. I don’t know what to do”. It was quite tragic. She never did make the visit, but when the LCDT company came to a closing party at the Opera House she at least spoke to some of the visitors, which in some way compensated”.

The judgement is reported in today’s Washington Post at http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A51471-2001Aug8.html
The NY Times reports it at http://www.nytimes.com/2001/08/08/arts/dance/08GRAH.html?searchpv=
A copy of Graham’s will can be found at http://www.danceinsider.com/f2001/f118_1.html
A (partisan) account of Protas' evidence in the case can be found at http://www.danceinsider.com/f2001/f327_1.html

  Printer-friendly page | Top

  Subject     Author     Message Date     ID  
  RE: Martha Graham Center v Ron Protas Brendan McCarthymoderator 21-12-01 1

Conferences | Topics | Previous Topic | Next Topic
Brendan McCarthymoderator

21-12-01, 05:30 PM (GMT)
Click to EMail Brendan%20McCarthy Click to send private message to Brendan%20McCarthy Click to add this user to your buddy list  
1. "RE: Martha Graham Center v Ron Protas"
In response to message #0
   There is to be no early resolution of the issue of the rights to Martha Graham's ballets. According to Paul Ben-Itzak, the editor of the website www.danceinsider.com, a trial will continue before Judge Miriam Cedarbaum, beginning on April 22nd, to determine who owns the copyrights to Graham's works, sets, costumes and related properties.

Talks between the Martha Graham School and the representatives of Ron Protas, to whom Graham willed her ballets, have broken down. He has replaced his legal counsel and decided to pursue his case in court.

In the meantime the Graham works are not being performed, and on the evidence of her determination of the issue of the rights to the Graham technique itself, Judge Cedarbaum is unlikely to be sympathetic to Protas on the issue of the choreographic rights.

This is an area where there is very little case law. How the Judge rules in the case will have implications for choreographers everywhere.

  Printer-friendly page | Top

Conferences | Topics | Previous Topic | Next Topic

Questions or problems regarding this bulletin board should be directed to Bruce Marriott