 |
Ann Williams
|
21-07-01, 09:17 PM (GMT) |
|
"Video's Mini-poll"
| |
The new poll requires some explanation as the question on the form has to be very brief. It concerns the possibility of interactive video screens on the back of seats enabling the audience to freeze the action, zoom in, rewind etc just like on home VCRs. (Thanks to Trog for this idea). Grateful for any suggestions for the following poll...
|
|
|
|
Printer-friendly page | Top |
|
|
Juliet
|
22-07-01, 02:30 PM (GMT) |
|
1. "RE: Video's Mini-poll"
In response to message #0
| |
Wouldn't it be intrusive on other members of the audience?, if they did not want to have the lights of a video screen on the back of the neighbours seat? One advantage is for the seats where you cannot see a thing, (tall seats in the balcony for example?). This way, the people sitting there may have more of a chance enjoying it. Juliet. |
|
|
|
Printer-friendly page | Top |
|
|
Brendan McCarthy
|
24-07-01, 05:58 PM (GMT) |
|
3. "RE: Video's Mini-poll - a digression"
In response to message #2
| |
Several years ago John Tusa, the Director of the Barbican Centre, wrote an essay about the future of the orchestral concert called "Seeing will be Hearing". He teasingly envisaged high definition TV screens at the side of the concert hall, and an introductory video viewable in the foyer. In the hall, the main TV camera would be fixed throughout on the conductor. Side screens would pick out particular soloists or sections as relevant. At the interval there would be audience interviews, or interviews with critics, a little like the interval of a football match. Then a post concert interview: Questioner: Well, Clive, how did it go tonight? Manager: I thought the boys and girls played a blinder. The team work was wonderful, the attack was overwhelming and there was no doubt who came on top - it was Beethoven Question: What pleased you most about the playing tonight? Answer: Well I liked the way the themes were distributed so unselfishly. No-one held onto them for too long, each section picked the theme up and ran with it, and it had tremendous drive and passion Question: Any particular stars tonight? Answer: Well you've got to single out Andrew Marriner - what a great clarinettist. And of the young stars, well David Pyatt has got to be the best first horn in any British Orchestra. It has possibilities. You can imagine Judith Mackrell interviewing Ross Stretton post-performance before throwing to a vox-pop of ballet.coers at the side of the Floral Hall..... But seriously -the experience of going to the ballet has changed. And it will change more. Audiences are more interested in background and explanation - and one cannot but feel that video will become part of the experience in some way, if not necessarily in the Main House .... John Tusa's "Art Matters", in which the essay appeared, was published by Methuen in 1999. The ISBN is: 0 413 73890 6 |
|
|
|
Printer-friendly page | Top |
|
|
eugene merrett
|
25-07-01, 12:26 PM (GMT) |
|
4. "RE: Video's Mini-poll - a digression"
In response to message #3
| |
When I was in Houston in May (seeing the Houston Operas vastly superior to the Kirov Don Carlos) I noticed very large screens were suspended from the ceiling for the convieniance of the audience in the ampthitheatre. I think that this is a great idea. It would be fantastic for ballet in the Amphitheatre and would I think really bring in the punters. As for LCD video at every seats - there is no arguement against except cost because if you do not like it then do not use it! But I think that there are bigger priorities for the ROH. But if Albert Vilar wants to install them - then let him do so! |
|
|
|
Printer-friendly page | Top |
|
|
Alexandra
|
25-07-01, 04:22 PM (GMT) |
 |
6. "RE: Video's Mini-poll - a digression"
In response to message #5
| |
I think this is a terrific idea. Back of the seats is better than the "surtitles" as we call them here (a marquee-like thing that runs across the top of the proscenium). Surtitles are frequently cited as the reason that attendance at opera has been up in the past decade -- no disrespect intended to The Three Tenors and their many PBS specials, but audiences have responded favorably to seeing translations of what they're hearing. In ballet, what if the video displayed the dancer's name as s/he came out to do a solo? (And I love Jim's idea of the video. Of course, they could charge for that -- new money maker!) The article Brendan cited reminds me of Professor Schickle and his PDQ Bach series. He did a play-by-play on the first movement of Beethoven's 5th that is hilarious, and made me think of the possibilities for ballet. I used to have a piece called "A Swan is Down, Ladies and Gentlemen..." but it got lost in one of my computer changes. The possibilities for back-of-the-seat interactivity are endless. Could we talk back to them? Something on the order of, "Wipe that grin off your face, straighten your shoulders when you turn, please, and remember you're supposed to HATE the fellow"? We could get out a lot of frustrations that way. |
|
|
|
Printer-friendly page | Top |
|
|
lara
|
25-07-01, 05:52 PM (GMT) |
 |
9. "RE: Video's Mini-poll - a digression"
In response to message #8
| |
I am thinking that I love technology, but too much is too much! With all the possibilities of zooming and such — on a very small screen no less, who will have time to watch the live dance. What if while fiddling around with the video you miss something important on stage? The figures on the screen will be so very small. How to jump back and forth visually between the stage and the screen. As much as I love seeing ballets on t.v. - sometimes better angle of view, replay the good parts, pause while getting a snack, the drawbacks are just as valid - too small people in any kind of a wide shot (unless one has a really big screen). And if the guy next to you is playing with his video, won't that kind of extra movement be distracting to the patron that is just sitting still watching? I see the video screen for opera — with less stage movement and where it would be nice to see a close-up of the singers face — the video screen could be a nice thing. But not for dance. Too much going on on stage to pay attention to the video screen. May as well stay home and see it on tv. Just some thoughts... Lara |
|
|
|
Printer-friendly page | Top |
|
|
Ann Williams
|
26-07-01, 01:22 PM (GMT) |
|
13. "RE: Video's Mini-poll - a digression"
In response to message #12
| |
>Perhaps if a dancer is performing particularly badly, we could vote them for eviction from the stage...< Pete, another of Trog's suggestions was that dancers who failed to please the audience could be hooked off the stage by means of a shepherd's crook around their neck... |
|
|
|
Printer-friendly page | Top |
|
|
Ann Williams
|
09-08-01, 04:14 PM (GMT) |
|
15. "RE: Video's Mini-poll"
In response to message #0
| |
Here are the poll results: Q: Interactive videos on theatre seats? Totally naff: 58.3% Worth considering: 20.8% Excellent idea!: 14.5% A gimmick: 6.2% other: 0% It appears we think seatback videos for ballet-watching is not a good thing at all. A bit unfair, given that they are designed to be discreet and invisible to other audience members, but there you go. I loved some of the suggestion though - Jim's idea of recording the show yourself for home viewing and Brendan's earphones and alternative selection of viewing. But think, Brendan - what if you chose to watch a comedy film and as a result kept bursting into loud guffaws during, say, Giselle... All this is more prettily(!) available on the Mini-poll page: http://www.danze.co.uk/survey/balletco_mini_poll.shtml |
|
|
|
Printer-friendly page | Top |
|
|
Questions or problems regarding this bulletin board should be
directed to
Bruce Marriott
|
|