HomeMagazineListingsUpdateLinksContexts

 


 Ballet.co Postings Pages

 Some Special Threads:
  GPDTalk about George Piper Dances ! NEW !
  NBTTalk about Northern Ballet Theatre
  SBTalk about Scottish Ballet
  ENBTalk about English National Ballet
  BRBTalk about Birmingham Royal Ballet
  TodaysLinks - worldwide daily dance links
  Ballet.co GetTogethers - meetings and drinks...

  Help on New Postings


Subject: "Stravinsky Triple Bill, 25/4/01, Covent Garden" Archived thread - Read only
 
  Previous Topic | Next Topic
Printer-friendly copy     Email this topic to a friend    
Conferences What's Happening Topic #1591
Reading Topic #1591
Lynette H

27-04-01, 02:51 PM (GMT)
Click to EMail Lynette%20H Click to send private message to Lynette%20H Click to view user profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
"Stravinsky Triple Bill, 25/4/01, Covent Garden"
 
   Royal Ballet, Stravinsky Triple Bill, Covent Garden, 25/4/01

Although the Royalís latest triple Bill at Covent Garden is unified by the music of Stravinsky, all works which were specifically composed as ballet scores, the diversity of the dance on show is striking. The narrative thread, elaborate costumes and lavish staging of The Firebird could hardly be more of a contrast to the pure and austere abstraction of Agon: and Les Noces is something different again, fierce, primitive, iconic. Some wonderful pieces of choreography were on display: but the company didnít look completely at ease in every item, and I hope they can get more under the skin of the works as the run progresses.

Firebird often features as a closing item on triple bills, but here it opens proceedings. It was the most familiar work on display, in the repertory of the Royal for many years, and the work in which the company looked most confident and at home in this programme. Leanne Benjamin is a bright, trembling, fierce Firebird. She hates and loathes her captor Ivan with a passion, but nevertheless enjoys her triumph over the evil Kostchei. She seemed to be summoning up the music with her fluttering hands as all his attendants fell before her. Itís a role she gives herself to wholeheartedly, a really striking performance, which fortunately for us was filmed by the BBC. Nigel Burley was Ivan Tsarevich, a rather underwritten role in this production - somehow the princes in the Kirovís production of Firebird seem rather more powerful and virile. The enchanted princesses look as charming as ever : they havenít got any better at catching the apples from the tree. They were elegantly led by Genesia Rosato. All the principals looked at ease in their roles and the company danced with vigour and evident enjoyment. A popular piece as ever.

Firebird was the earliest work on the programme, made by Fokine in 1909: itís a curious work, which retains the lavishness and spectacle of 19th century ballets, while at the same time moving away from their structures and conventional use of mime. Agon was made less than 50 years later, but in quite a different world, an uncluttered world from which the scenery and costumes have been stripped away leaving the dance alone, unornamented, sufficient in itself. Balanchineís Agon has not featured particularly frequently in the Royalís repertoire: it was last performed here about ten years ago, and it would be idle to pretend that all the cast looked really comfortable in the style. The Royalís wasnít a great performance: even so, the marvellous structure of the ballet, the music made flesh, is still there to marvel at.

Acosta and Yanowsky performed the final pas de deux: itís an interesting pairing, her cool and distant air with his warmth. The dancers looked rather tense for the most part. Jamie Tapper looked most at ease among the women (and received a really positive reception), and Kobborg among the men. Overall, I came way with a sense of anticlimax in the performance (though not in the work itself: there seems to be something new to find in it each time, especially when we get so few chances to see it). The reception was generally respectful rather than enthusiastic. I was interested to see that the stager, Patricia Neary, took a bow with the cast: I donít think Iíve seen that done before for any Balanchine performances here.

Nijinskaís Les Biches in the Royalís last season had been a real delight - sharp, clever, beautifully designed and obviously the product of an experienced, complex choreographer whose work is rarely seen these days. So Les Noces was keenly anticipated. Itís a very different work in style and tone from the worldly sophistication of Les Biches. It seemed odd to reflect that the productionís stark brown and white designs were by Goncharova, who also designed the opulent Firebird.

Les Noces presents a series of tableaux, rather than a narrative as such, of a Russian peasant wedding. The ballet was made in 1923, to Stravinskyís last score for Diaghilev. If it recalls anything it is perhaps Rite of Spring (in the music) and possibly some of Nijinskyís choreography in its twisted and hunched, flat stances for the dancers. It is a work for the massed ranks of the wedding guests, arranged in great sculptural groupings, rather than for individual display. The bride and bridegroom, and their parents strike simple, hieratic poses, staring as gravely and impassively as ancient Egyptian statues as the corps groups and re groups around them. The groupings are very deliberate, formal, symmetrical. (I wondered how much influence these had had on Ashton, who invited Nijinska to revive Les Noces for the Royal - he is fond at times of similar towers of people, in Dante Sonata, Ondine and others).

Yanowsky as the bride was possessed of the same monumental stillness as she showed as the lead nymph last year in LíApres midi díun faune: David Pickering was her solemn husband to be. The lead couple of the corps were Sasaki and Tranah.

Much depends on the crispness and unanimity of the corps in this work, and the men certainly looked a bit ragged at times. Nijinska masses the dancers into great piles of bodies, or sends them as massed groups stamping and jumping across the stage to the pounding rhythms. The effect is both ancient and modern at once: both ancient tribal fertility rite (the bride and bridegroom are led off into the bedroom at the close) and a work very much of its time. I found it compelling stuff, even if the company again didnít quite look as if they had fully got to grips with the complexities of the dance.


  Printer-friendly page | Top

  Subject     Author     Message Date     ID  
  RE: Stravinsky Triple Bill - 2nd cast Kevin Ng 04-05-01 1

Conferences | Topics | Previous Topic | Next Topic
Kevin Ng

04-05-01, 03:44 PM (GMT)
Click to EMail Kevin%20Ng Click to send private message to Kevin%20Ng Click to view user profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
1. "RE: Stravinsky Triple Bill - 2nd cast"
In response to message #0
 
   In the second cast which I saw last Saturday, Miyako Yoshida was a moving Firebird. Her jumps were gorgeous, and her arm movements were sparkling. Yoshida was more expressive and had a warmer presence than Leanne Benjamin in the first cast. Jonathan Cope danced Ivan with the proper weight.

This Royal Ballet production of "Firebird", with the original designs by Natalia Gontcharova, is more authentic than the Kirov's version shown last summer. The final tableau of the wedding with all its imperial splendour is a glorious feast for the eye.

The third work "Les Noces" also has scenery by Natalia Gontcharova. This ballet is not easy to like, due to the harshness of Nijinska's choreography which has deliberately stripped out any romantic flavour. The robotic groupings for the ensemble of villagers have a militaristic aggression. However the finale when the bride and groom leave the proceedings and retreat to another room is very moving. In the second cast Genesia Rosato was a graceful bride, while Maurice Vodegel-Matzen had a notable presence as the bridegroom. The friends and villagers were led in style by Belinda Hatley and Yohei Sasaki.

In Balanchine's masterpiece "Agon", there is a symmetry and logicality in the choreography which never fails to marvel. The Royal Ballet's second cast, like the first cast, got the full measure of Balanchine's intricate choreography, though of course they couldn't match some of the stylistic niceties of the New York City Ballet. Johan Persson was witty in the first pas de trois, though Marianela Nunez in the second pas de trois lacked the incisiveness of Jaimie Tapper in the first cast.

The great pas de deux was danced by Christina Arestis and Johannes Stepanek whom I preferred to the first cast. Arestis had more volume in her turn-out and was more dazzling than Zenaida Yanowsky. Johannes Stepanek was a handsome cavlier, though he had less flair than Carlos Acosta.

It is a pity that the Royal Ballet was not allowed by the Balanchine Trust to have this "Agon" filmed by the BBC together with the other two Stravinsky works.


  Printer-friendly page | Top

Conferences | Topics | Previous Topic | Next Topic

 
Questions or problems regarding this bulletin board should be directed to Bruce Marriott