Ballet.co Postings Pages

 Some Special Threads:
  GPDTalk about George Piper Dances ! NEW !
  NBTTalk about Northern Ballet Theatre
  SBTalk about Scottish Ballet
  ENBTalk about English National Ballet
  BRBTalk about Birmingham Royal Ballet
  TodaysLinks - worldwide daily dance links
  Ballet.co GetTogethers - meetings and drinks...

  Help on New Postings

Subject: "Royal Ballet Triple Bill 13/7/99" Archived thread - Read only
  Previous Topic | Next Topic
Printer-friendly copy     Email this topic to a friend    
Conferences What's Happening Topic #151
Reading Topic #151

15-07-99, 03:27 PM (GMT)
Click to EMail Halewood Click to send private message to Halewood Click to view user profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
"Royal Ballet Triple Bill 13/7/99"
   The first of the triple bills in the Royalís run at Sadlerís featured a revival of a MacMillan work, a return of Ashley Pageís Fearful Symmetries, and a London appearance for some of the works made for the Dance Bites tour earlier this year. I saw the final performance of the programme on 13 July: this featured Tuckettís Loveís Fool rather than Baldwinís Towards Poetry as the opening work.

Loveís Fool is a light hearted, rather insubstantial piece which injects a note of levity into an otherwise rather dark programme. Its subject is an office romance, where the shy office manager (Christopher Saunders) is urged to declare his affections for one of his staff (Yanowsky) by an odd visitor who only he can see (Luke Heydon in an ill fitting clownís costume), all the while under scrutiny by the office staff (a corps of six). Itís pleasant enough and springs no great surprises. In fact the mysterious stranger facilitating a romance seemed rather similar to the guardian angel idea in AMPís Cinderella.

My Brother, My Sisters was a much nastier experience: possibly not nasty enough, though. It seems to have been made by Macmillan in one of his more sadistic moods. Not only does it portray the most unpleasantly dysfunctional family playing twisted sexual and other games with each other, it puts the dancers through extremely demanding contortions. Leanne Benjamin and Carlos Acosta writhe under, over and around each other: David Pickering is asked to lift two intertwined dancers simultaneously. It was disconcerting stuff, not at all easy to follow (the low levels of lighting made it difficult to distinguish some of the women from each other, but maybe thatís the point: is he with the third or fourth girl now?). Carlos Acosta made all the jumps and lifts look preposterously easy, and partnered with care: but there was nevertheless no sense of threat in his performance. I havenít seen this work before, but it felt oddly lacking in menace, and the clash between the first and second sisters (Benjamin and Revie, both usually impressive in MacMillan) lacked real tension until the very end.

Fearful Symmetries was made by Ashley Page in 1994, and remains one of the best things heís done. Itís a solidly constructed piece, tightly fitted to Adamís music which seems to propel the dancers across the stage. The fifteen dancers throw themselves into it with real ferocity. Itís interesting to see Mukhamedov in a completely abstract work for a change: he still projects a remarkable intensity while zipping across the stage. Shi Ning Liu and Abegglen also looked as if they relished every step. Bull, Galeazzi and Yanowsky were the lead women. It seemed very much a team effort, though rather than a star vehicle.

Sadlers was still surprisingly full, considering that this isnít the stronger of the Royalís triple bills, and that there is plenty of competition for dance audiences in London right now. Overall, the Royalís dancers were looking on good form, and there is lots to look forward to here in the next few weeks.

  Printer-friendly page | Top

  Subject     Author     Message Date     ID  
  RE: Royal Ballet Triple Bill 13/7/99 Jessica Hanner 16-07-99 1

Conferences | Topics | Previous Topic | Next Topic
Jessica Hanner

16-07-99, 10:53 PM (GMT)
Click to EMail Jessica%20Hanner Click to send private message to Jessica%20Hanner Click to add this user to your buddy list  
1. "RE: Royal Ballet Triple Bill 13/7/99"
In response to message #0
   Just a brief note as I am not confident enought to write a review on this- I am glad that you mentioned the lighting as I thought that I was going blind in the second piece.

I have to say that one of the most memorable things about this piece was that it is evidence Leanne Benjamin is clearly back at full fitness. I am sure that I am missing the point (never having seen this before) but I think the point about relationships has been made better by Macmillan in the Judas Tree, The invitation etc (take your pick)

I enjoyed Tuckett's Love's Fool (albeit not as much as Puirt A Beul) - Zenaida Yenowsky seems to be doing quite a line in 30s style glamour pusses.

The highlight of the evening for me was Fearful Symmetries. I think that the Sadlers' Wells stage lends itself well to modern pieces as its smaller size emphasises the steps and immediacy of the piece (however, this merely serves to make 19th century stuff like Giselle look ridiculously cramped). I thought that Bull and Mukhamedov gave very strong performances as did Mara Galeazzi (although is she in danger of being type cast in the more modern pieces particularly with the upcoming film??)

  Printer-friendly page | Top

Conferences | Topics | Previous Topic | Next Topic

Questions or problems regarding this bulletin board should be directed to Bruce Marriott