Ballet.co Postings Pages

 Some Special Threads:
  GPDTalk about George Piper Dances ! NEW !
  NBTTalk about Northern Ballet Theatre
  SBTalk about Scottish Ballet
  ENBTalk about English National Ballet
  BRBTalk about Birmingham Royal Ballet
  TodaysLinks - worldwide daily dance links
  Ballet.co GetTogethers - meetings and drinks...

  Help on New Postings

Subject: "Clement Crisp review" Archived thread - Read only
  Previous Topic | Next Topic
Printer-friendly copy     Email this topic to a friend    
Conferences What's Happening Topic #130
Reading Topic #130

09-07-99, 12:16 PM (GMT)
Click to EMail Eugene%20MERRETT Click to send private message to Eugene%20MERRETT Click to add this user to your buddy list  
"Clement Crisp review"
   Here a new one - a review of a review!

I found Clement Crisp’s review of La Bayadere fascinating for what it had and not have.

He comments that the Russian’s take the Kingdom scene much faster then the Western productions. I think I pointed out the brisker tempi sometime ago when I reviewed a few La Bayadere video. Clement Crisp thinks it more dramatic when done faster. Personally I think the slower tempos (and lighter orchestration) give it more spirituality and atmosphere. I also note that Nureyev well know Paris production he uses the slower “Western” tempo and Lanchberry’s sparer orchestration.

But it is all rather surprising about the Russian choice of faster tempi. My personal observations is that the Russian’s take things slower in most ballets. Their recent performance of Giselle was taking slower the RB production

Mr Crisp sings the praises of Nadia Gracheva. This is surprising as it seems the other newspaper ballet critics have panned her performance. Obviously I cannot comment on whose is right (if there is right in this context) – unlike some critics I do not form opinions of dancers until I have actually seen them!

But is interesting to note the way which ballet generates so many different opinions. I do not think any art form generates so completely different views of ballet. Which is why I think it is so important to for critics to say why or why not they like a particular dancers performance (particularly if you do not like his/her performance). When I read other peoples reviews I pay more attention to their assessments and not their final opinion – this is too subjective to be reliable. It is obvious that in ballet one person’s meat is someone else’s poison. So I was very happy with Mr Crisp’s thoughtful commentary on Gracheva.

But it I was less happy with Mr Crisp’s omission of the glaring faults in the production. The stomach turning political incorrectness and the fantastic padding of the plot with so much dancing. It is not as if he did not have space – his review is far longer then Anne Sacks one or the other newspapers.

I think that Mr Crisp should not be writing program notes for the Bolshoi programing. I am imply ABSOLUTELY NOTHING but independance in APPEARANCE is just as important as idependance in FACT

  Printer-friendly page | Top

  Subject     Author     Message Date     ID  
  RE: Clement Crisp review jonathan 09-07-99 1

Conferences | Topics | Previous Topic | Next Topic

09-07-99, 03:09 PM (GMT)
Click to EMail jonathan Click to send private message to jonathan Click to add this user to your buddy list  
1. "RE: Clement Crisp review"
In response to message #0
   >But it I was less happy with
>Mr Crisp’s omission of the glaring
>faults in the production. The
>stomach turning political incorrectness and the
>fantastic padding of the plot with
>so much dancing>>

His is a review of the company and how it performed. This is only fair to the dancers, musicians and choreographers who actually dish up the thing for us to watch.

Some reviewers take at least a third of their column inches to talk about themselves, how they got to the theatre, what they feel about where dance is/should be going, and another third to place the piece they saw in some sort of historical-cultural context, with no more insight and research than an undergraduate essay.

Clement Crisp did mention the political correctness in passing, but gave it no more than the knowing wince that it deserved. It is after all a ballet, not a Metropolitan Police policy document.

  Printer-friendly page | Top

Conferences | Topics | Previous Topic | Next Topic

Questions or problems regarding this bulletin board should be directed to Bruce Marriott