Ballet.co Postings Pages

 Some Special Threads:
  GPDTalk about George Piper Dances ! NEW !
  NBTTalk about Northern Ballet Theatre
  SBTalk about Scottish Ballet
  ENBTalk about English National Ballet
  BRBTalk about Birmingham Royal Ballet
  TodaysLinks - worldwide daily dance links
  Ballet.co GetTogethers - meetings and drinks...

  Help on New Postings

Subject: "Review of Sleeping Beauty in Washington Post" Archived thread - Read only
  Previous Topic | Next Topic
Printer-friendly copy     Email this topic to a friend    
Conferences What's Happening Topic #108
Reading Topic #108

03-07-99, 04:18 PM (GMT)
Click to EMail Alexandra Click to send private message to Alexandra Click to view user profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
"Review of Sleeping Beauty in Washington Post"
   Bruce, I hope this doesn't mess up your threads. I thought people might be interested in a review of the Kirov's "Sleeping Beauty" that was in the Washington Post today, and since it's long, I'm starting a new thread with it instead of sticking it on the already existing one. Hope this is all right.

Kirov Revives a Classic 'Beauty' By Sarah Kaufman Washington Post Staff Writer Saturday, July 3, 1999; Page C01

NEW YORK—The Lilac Fairy said it would be 100 years until Sleeping Beauty awakened.

It's actually taken 109.

The Kirov Ballet, the Russian company that first performed the full-length "Sleeping Beauty" in 1890, has now resurrected it.

Balletgoers thought they knew this ballet, inspired by the well-known Charles Perrault fairy tale of a spellbound princess awakened by a kiss. But before this week's performances at the Metropolitan Opera House, what they had been seeing from the Kirov company was Soviet revisionism. Only a shadow of the original czarist Russian spectacle remained. After a century of revisions, the Kirov has returned to the steps and staging of choreographer Marius Petipa, who, in collaboration with composer Peter Tchaikovsky, crafted the original.

In the early 1900s, "The Sleeping Beauty" was revived by Kirov rehearsal director Nicholas Sergeyev, who made extensive notes of Petipa's staging. He later emigrated, taking his notebooks with him. Eventually, the notebooks were purchased by Harvard University.

Meanwhile, "Sleeping Beauty" was getting blanketed with new treatments.

A pure "Soviet" look was desired instead, with more austere settings. The antiquated mime scenes were cut. More virtuoso dancing was added. The domination of good (Princess Aurora's sweet protectress, the Lilac Fairy) over evil (the wicked fairy Carabosse) was emphasized, rather than Petipa's notion of redemption.

In Petipa's original, Carabosse, whose vengefulness leads to Princess Aurora's long slumber, is later a guest at Aurora's wedding. In the Soviet version, Carabosse is never heard from after Act 2.

In recent years the Kirov seemed under a curse itself. It lost stature during the tumultuous ouster of its director, Oleg Vinogradov (also head of the local Kirov Academy of Ballet), who was accused, though not convicted, of financial improprieties. And like many state-supported institutions, it has had to deal with hard times and shrinking subsidies. Two years ago, having dusted itself off from that upheaval, the Kirov negotiated with Harvard for access to the old notes. The new version--staged by Kirov soloist Sergei Vikharev and augmented by choreography from various other productions--is the fruit of those efforts.

It is a historic moment, an outcome of newfound artistic freedom--and a gift to the world of ballet.

Resurrected here are the opulent sets and costumes of the 1890 original, the lovely passages told in pantomime and the forgiveness of Carabosse. A final apotheosis, illustrating the Greek god Apollo, ties the whole story in with the very font of Western civilization. There's a sense of cleansing, too. The dancing is less cluttered, opened up and simplified in some cases. Grandeur has been chosen over technical pizzazz. Some bits come from the notebooks, some from other choreographers. But despite the piecemeal approach, there is conceptual consistency.

Thus, scholars, historians and critics, not to mention the dance-going public, have been flocking to performances of the resulting production. (The last one was Wednesday night; the Kirov performs "Giselle," "The Fountain of Bakchisaray" and a program of George Balanchine works through July 10.)

As an added reward at Wednesday's matinee, a ballerina in the sunset of her career--the unparalleled Altynai Asylmuratova, who is nearing 40 and getting leading roles less and less often--elevated this "Beauty" and the reams of research that went into it to a spiritual level.

Things are, indeed, back to where they belong.

This is not to say that the Kirov production has no faults. At the Met, it clocked in at more than 3 1/2 hours. The ballet sags in the second act, the hunting scene, where Prince Desire sees a vision of Aurora. An extended violin solo is included, though the panorama scene it was to accompany is not included in the Met production. So the solo is played with the curtain closed and it sends the audience into a slump. It should have been cut.

The production's pleasures, though, are many. In keeping with the imperial heritage of "Sleeping Beauty," this production is a feast of material excess. The sets swallow up the huge Met stage. There are marbled rooms, ornately carved ceilings, a lush wooded setting and a depiction of the gardens of Versailles.

The costumes befit Old World royalty: richly colored in red and blue, exquisitely tucked and draped.

Above all this production succeeds by virtue of the matchless Kirov dancing. On display were the purity, uncluttered technique and especially the expansive, generous use of the arms that the world came to know through the Kirov's famous expatriates, such as Rudolf Nureyev, Natalia Makarova and Mikhail Baryshnikov.

Petipa meticulously constructed this ballet as a total classical concept. That is, the story celebrates the virtues of order, public decency and adherence to form (as distinct from the romantic ideals of the ensuing era: passionate love, emotion and creative freedom). These are mirrored in the ballet's structure--there are fast sections followed by serene ones--and internal logic. Jumps are followed by slow passages. Mime scenes lead into danced ones.

The dancers must embody this propriety, as well. This is where Asylmuratova and her cavalier, the effortless and well-mannered Andrian Fadeyev as Prince Desire, excelled. Asylmuratova has all the celebrated formal qualities: a velvety line to her legs; long, highly arched feet; silken arms; and when she dances, the music seems to come from within her body.

But she never flaunted her gifts at the expense of her role. She can hold a balance endlessly--and her extended poses, where she is poised en pointe on one leg and amplifies her position with unfathomable composure, are not just flashy "tricks," but an integral element in Petipa's concept. Balance--symmetry--is all. Simply put, Asylmuratova's understated and deeply intelligent performance was imbued with poetry, good taste and a sense of responsibility. Her Aurora could make you believe in the divine predestination of royalty.

Will the Kirov stick with this cumbersome but magnificent production?

That's not clear. But whatever the outcome, there is this: In presenting this "Sleeping Beauty" to the world, the Kirov has awakened, too. In restoring order to what had been rent by politics, bad taste and time, it has lived up to the ideals of the ballet itself.

© Copyright 1999 The Washington Post Company

  Printer-friendly page | Top

  Subject     Author     Message Date     ID  
  RE: Review of Sleeping Beauty in Washington Post Bruce Madmin 03-07-99 1
  RE: Review of Sleeping Beauty in Washington Post Wendy Glavis 04-07-99 2

Conferences | Topics | Previous Topic | Next Topic
Bruce Madmin

03-07-99, 04:47 PM (GMT)
Click to EMail Bruce%20M Click to send private message to Bruce%20M Click to view user profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
1. "RE: Review of Sleeping Beauty in Washington Post"
In response to message #0
   >Bruce, I hope this doesn't mess up
>your threads. I thought people might
>be interested in a review of
>the Kirov's "Sleeping Beauty" that was
>in the Washington Post today, and
>since it's long, I'm starting a
>new thread with it instead of
>sticking it on the already existing
>one. Hope this is all right.

Hi Alexandra. Nice Wimbledon weather over here!

I have moved this into the What's Happening forum because that is where we tend to put all our reviews.

The only thing of concern is that the piece is copyright the Washington Post and I doubt that anybody will have sought permission from them to print the words elsewhere. Not having a legal training I've always been wary about being seen to host such words. I suppose taken to its logical conclusion we could grab all the words we could find and hold them in such a way - allow people to search etc. It could be a hell of a resource. The NY Times would be interesting because we would then be in a position of giving free access to words that the original owners of the piece charge for. For this reason we don't generally post up Financial Times pieces on the site (Like NY Times they charge after a while). But its open to any owner to say that their words have been taken and I guess I would feel pretty sick if one of our copyright pieces turned up quoted in full elsewhere

So why are the words still here then?! Well I see it is just Ok to post the piece here because there is always an exception to a rule and we are having a debate about a new production and the review is part of that debate.

But I would ask readers to be careful about postings reviews or whatever in their entirety on the site and if I think we are overstepping the mark, I will have to remove such pieces. It would be different perhaps if we charged folks a proper cover price for Ballet.co and hence were in a position to take proper advice and defend ourselves. Sorry to go a little legal on folks - but being in the firing line means I can't avoid it.

  Printer-friendly page | Top
Wendy Glavis

04-07-99, 01:59 PM (GMT)
Click to EMail Wendy%20Glavis Click to send private message to Wendy%20Glavis Click to view user profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
2. "RE: Review of Sleeping Beauty in Washington Post"
In response to message #0
   Thanks, Alexandra, for posting this - and thanks to Bruce for letting her.
I saw Altynai at the Wednesday Matinee and I agree with everything the reviewer says about her. Altynai has the ability, even when she isn't doing very much, to make every movement look important. And she certainly didn't LOOK 39!
One point about the review which did strike me as being wrong - feel free to correct me on this, folks - is that I think the Panorama music was cut; in the Kirov videos of `Beauty' you sometimes see that violin music played as a sort of interval before the curtain opens on the awakening scene. And I thought the violin solo was beautiful.

  Printer-friendly page | Top

Conferences | Topics | Previous Topic | Next Topic

Questions or problems regarding this bulletin board should be directed to Bruce Marriott